[WIP] Start unifyDB dev diary 1
This commit is contained in:
parent
810db6dde4
commit
6684dcc13a
43
src/blog/unifydb-dev-diary-1-query.html.pm
Normal file
43
src/blog/unifydb-dev-diary-1-query.html.pm
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
#lang pollen
|
||||
|
||||
◊(define-meta title "unifyDB Dev Diary 1: the query system")
|
||||
◊(define-meta published "2020-09-28")
|
||||
|
||||
This is the first development diary for the database I'm writing, ◊link[#:href "https://github.com/unifydb/unifydb" #:target "_blank"]{unifyDB}. I wrote a brief introduction to the project ◊link[#:href "https://jeremydormitzer.com/blog/unifydb-dev-diary-0-intro.html" #:target "_blank"]{here}. In this post I'm going to talk about unifyDB's query system: what it does and how it works.
|
||||
|
||||
I want to start with an example of a unifyDB query, but to understand that we need to understand a bit about how unifyDB represents data. All data in unifyDB is stored as a collection of facts. A fact is a tuple with three pieces of information: an entity ID, an attribute name, and a value (actually, a fact has two additional fields, a transaction ID and an ◊code{added?} flag, but we won't worry about those until we talk about time-traveling queries, which deserves its own blog post). For example, we might represent a user record with the following set of facts:
|
||||
|
||||
◊codeblock{
|
||||
(1, "username", "jdormit")
|
||||
(1, "role", "user")
|
||||
(1, "role", "admin")
|
||||
(1, "preferred-theme", "light")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
This corresponds with the following record in a more conventional JSON format:
|
||||
|
||||
◊codeblock[#:lang "json"]{
|
||||
{
|
||||
"username": "jdormit",
|
||||
"role": ["user", "admin"],
|
||||
"preferred-theme": "light"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
With that under our belt, let's take a look at an example unifyDB query. The unifyDB server understands query written in ◊link[#:href "https://github.com/edn-format/edn" #:target "_blank"]{extensible data notation}, but database clients for different programming languages will allow developers to write queries that feel native to that language. Here's a query in EDN format:
|
||||
|
||||
◊codeblock[#:lang "clojure"]{
|
||||
{:find [?username]
|
||||
:where [[?e :preferred-theme "light"]
|
||||
[?e :username ?username]]}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
This query says, “find me the values of all the ◊code{username} attributes of entities whose ◊code{preferred-theme} is ◊code{"light"}”. If we run this query on the set of facts given above, it would return:
|
||||
|
||||
◊codeblock[#:lang "clojure"]{
|
||||
[["jdormit"]]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the return value is a list of lists — although our query only asked for one field, ◊code{username}, it could have asked for more, in which case each result in the result list would be a list with all the requested values. Once again, although unifyDB itself returns data in EDN format, client libraries will wrap that return value in whatever native data structure is convenient.
|
||||
|
||||
Let’s break that query down a bit. First, a bit of notation: any symbol that starts with a ◊code{?} is called a variable, and is similar in spirit to a variable in a programming language. The query above has two major pieces: a ◊code{:find} clause and a ◊code{:where} clause. The ◊code{:find} clause is straightforward: it asks to find the value of the variable ◊code{?username}. But how does it know what value that variable has? That’s where thing interesting.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user